WS 1.3 PVP?

HI quick poll here.

Should we put WS in the PVP world (If we get one) in 1.3 so that players can battle as well?

Please answer, I would like the WS Staff's opinions as well. :)

@revilo410

If PVP is added, the arena should be expanded a great amount more. (I know you are anyway)

Anyway, PVP would be great

I have already suggested an Oasis hunger games, I don't know if that is the same but if you would like to check out the page it's under minigames.

As you may or may not know Wave Survival is a popular Oasis mini game in which the players battle against mobs fired from spawners, what I was suggesting was that we placed the WS arena in PVP world in 1.3 so that the players may fight each other as well as the mobs I have not seen your post on hg in oasis but I will look and if you think I am copying you (which I hope I'm not) I'm sure we can negotiate something :)

WS Owner - Revilo410

This would definitely add a lot more depth and strategy to WS. Instead of just fighting computer programs, you can fight (or ally with) actual people who have differing ideas and hidden motives.

For example, a Mob is easy to understand: zombies will rush you, skeletons will shoot you, and spiders will do the same as zombies. However, people are much different. With a person, I could form an alliance, fight with that person, then betray them for my own selfish ends. It adds unpredictability and a certain amount of fun to it. And as for copying HG, why don't we just combine the two? Make Wave Survival a Hunger game with mobs.

Brick here is a deal:

I will induct you onto the WS staff, we will then have WS into the Pvp world so it is WS + HG.

It will still be called WS but with the added Pvp it will have a lot of aspects of HG.

What do you say!

Rev

Btw this is not a final decision yet im going to talk with the WS admins.

But this will probably happen, if it does then u can be WS staff brick.

Only problem I see would be the stadium getting griefed, since it's a PvP world.

BroadStreetBully wrote:Only problem I see would be the stadium getting griefed, since it's a PvP world.

Mhm. That WILL happen.
But, as I say, take on one thing at a time. RE: HG+WS; well I think it would really work so much, as they're slightly different, and that difference does make it hard to do. Personally, I think we should have an arena with monsters AND other players killing all the time. Something like WS+ would've a good name.

I say pvp on, yet, not quite hunger games. Hunger games is ALL about the pvp, this is about mostly mobs.





I didn't like the idea of PvP, but it'll just boost the survival elements to the max.

Luckily broad WS is concealed undergrOund in a bedrock box.

I think that sounds fun, players vs players with mobs. I don't actually know what the inside of WS looks like or really how it works, so I can't compare HG with WS other than the fact that WS is with mobs and HG is with players. But, if everyone agrees to merge the two, I certainly won't stop that. If we decide to keep them separate, then of course I will go with it. Whatever the community decides will be most fun, I will try to oblige their requests.

brickhunter1 wrote:merge the two

Anti-vouch.

Tbh, I think it's not the best idea ever. I think killing people and mobs together is a bit much. For example. You're killing a zombie and some random camper (troll) comes up behind you and kills you. Theres already enough raging with the mobs. Even more with other players involved. I just see a lot of stuff going wrong. Soo I don't see it working.

AnOther plus side to this is that there will be no ties!

When the mobs run out then it's a pvp showdown the guy next to uou isn't gonna give up a massive cash prize because he is ur friend.


I think I am fore this but I will have a final decision tomorrow as I promised. Post here if you want to change my mind!

keshaluver wrote:Tbh, I think it's not the best idea ever. I think killing people and mobs together is a bit much. For example. You're killing a zombie and some random camper (troll) comes up behind you and kills you. Theres already enough raging with the mobs. Even more with other players involved. I just see a lot of stuff going wrong. Soo I don't see it working.

The mob count would probably have to go down since your point is correct, but I think the backstabbing is just the name of the game. If a skeleton was behind you and you didn't know it, he would shoot you just the same as a player, not even caring if you would rage. Plus, if you are a good player, you take one hit from behind and immediately whirl around and attack the person. So, I think it's a good idea.

brickhunter1 wrote:

keshaluver wrote:Tbh, I think it's not the best idea ever. I think killing people and mobs together is a bit much. For example. You're killing a zombie and some random camper (troll) comes up behind you and kills you. Theres already enough raging with the mobs. Even more with other players involved. I just see a lot of stuff going wrong. Soo I don't see it working.

The mob count would probably have to go down since your point is correct, but I think the backstabbing is just the name of the game. If a skeleton was behind you and you didn't know it, he would shoot you just the same as a player, not even caring if you would rage. Plus, if you are a good player, you take one hit from behind and immediately whirl around and attack the person. So, I think it's a good idea.

Still, Don't you think there would be a lot more chaos from it? I mean, With the hidden chests and all. Its not fair to each player because someone could have full iron armor and a gold sword, When another player is doing bare arms with leather armor, Having to fight of zombies, Skeletons, Spider ect. and another player who has a total advantage? I don't think thats fair. It not about the mob number. I think we should Just keep WS the same as old WS.

keshaluver wrote:

brickhunter1 wrote:

keshaluver wrote:Tbh, I think it's not the best idea ever. I think killing people and mobs together is a bit much. For example. You're killing a zombie and some random camper (troll) comes up behind you and kills you. Theres already enough raging with the mobs. Even more with other players involved. I just see a lot of stuff going wrong. Soo I don't see it working.

The mob count would probably have to go down since your point is correct, but I think the backstabbing is just the name of the game. If a skeleton was behind you and you didn't know it, he would shoot you just the same as a player, not even caring if you would rage. Plus, if you are a good player, you take one hit from behind and immediately whirl around and attack the person. So, I think it's a good idea.

Still, Don't you think there would be a lot more chaos from it? I mean, With the hidden chests and all. Its not fair to each player because someone could have full iron armor and a gold sword, When another player is doing bare arms with leather armor, Having to fight of zombies, Skeletons, Spider ect. and another player who has a total advantage? I don't think thats fair. It not about the mob number. I think we should Just keep WS the same as old WS.

Ya. I actually agree. It turns way survival into just PvP with mobs.

Keshaluver wrote:

brickhunter1 wrote:

keshaluver wrote:Tbh, I think it's not the best idea ever. I think killing people and mobs together is a bit much. For example. You're killing a zombie and some random camper (troll) comes up behind you and kills you. Theres already enough raging with the mobs. Even more with other players involved. I just see a lot of stuff going wrong. Soo I don't see it working.

The mob count would probably have to go down since your point is correct, but I think the backstabbing is just the name of the game. If a skeleton was behind you and you didn't know it, he would shoot you just the same as a player, not even caring if you would rage. Plus, if you are a good player, you take one hit from behind and immediately whirl around and attack the person. So, I think it's a good idea.

Still, Don't you think there would be a lot more chaos from it? I mean, With the hidden chests and all. Its not fair to each player because someone could have full iron armor and a gold sword, When another player is doing bare arms with leather armor, Having to fight of zombies, Skeletons, Spider ect. and another player who has a total advantage? I don't think thats fair. It not about the mob number. I think we should Just keep WS the same as old WS.

Well, it is their fault they didn't find the secret chests. But, even if this idea doesn't work out, I hope we will still have some sort of PvP death match/hunger games separate from wave survival.

I think what would happen is that everyone but a single team or something would hit eachother at the spawn as soon as the gate opens (or even before that) and just kill everyone until it's like 5 people left or something and it wouldn't even be about surviving the mobs at all. I go from yes to idc to no to hell no for pvp suggestion. Sorry.

As WS Owner I have come to a decision as promised.

I agree with all of your point and I think the WS PVP would be fun BUT there are also a lot of BAD points!

I agree with you kevo, It will turn into PVP with mobs and that is not the game you created!

And Kelly as well, that it would be too much chaos.

I also agree with brick that it would be fun.

With all this in mind I have come to a decision...

THERE WILL BE NO PVP FOR WAVE SURVIVAL IN 1.3!

Sorry if you wanted it but there will probably be a hunger games in 1.3 as well.

Also the Vote says no.

This was a very hard choice to make but I have decided!

@Revilo410